Dr. Clement Fugh @ 11:44 am
When the morning of June 29, 2004, dawns, we–the spiritual sons and daughters of Richard and Sarah Allen–will begin arriving in Indianapolis. We will come by way of our cars, our vans, chartered buses, by air, by train–but we will come: the young, the old, the hierarchy of the church, the elected delegates and alternates, the observers and the visitors. We will come up from the South, African Methodism’s stronghold; from the North and East with their great urban cities; from the West where the Church stretches from the Mississippi River to the Pacific Ocean; from Bermuda, the West Indies, and Mother Africa. We will come as we always have–every four years–with hope in hearts that this session of the General Conference will break new ground by correcting the ills that beset us and addressing those issues that threaten our survival as God’s relevant institution of today.
Many will gather, but many others will have answered the roll call. Among these latter, however, are those, I feel, whose spirits still hover over us, hoping that we will remember their love for and their contributions to African Methodism. So on their behalf–the departed giants of yesteryear–I would have your remember them.
On behalf of Bishop Reverdy C. Ransom who stirred the conscience of the Church at the February, 1928, Session of the Council of Bishops in Birmingham, Alabama, with his sermon “The Church of the Living God, Pillar and Ground of the Truth,” in which he dealt specifically with the problems of burdensome assessments.
On behalf of the Reverends Elmer Reid (brother of Bishop Frank Reid, Sr.), M. E. Jackson (former pastor of Bridge Street, Brooklyn), and Dr. G. L. Jackson of Tennessee who wrote and signed their names to the challenging statement leading up to the1928 General Conference entitled “Reformation or Revolution?”
On behalf of the courageous ministers who at the 1928 General Conference in Chicago were responsible for the resolution creating the “eight-year” law in order to protect the many ministers who had suffered because of the abuse of the appointive power of some bishops: the Reverends Joseph Gomez (author of the resolution and later the 67th bishop), D.O. Walker (later the 66th bishop), Henry Young Tooks (later the 56th bishop), E. A. Adams (later Secretary of Education), George A. Singleton (later Editor of the AME Review and Christian Recorder).
On behalf of the Brotherhood and their supporters on the Bench of Bishops who advocated and established for the first time at the 1956 General Conference a General Budget Fund, the General Board, and an Episcopal Fund.
On behalf of the former candidates for the bishopric committed to change who were not elected: The Reverends Charles Leander Hill; Archibald Carey; Ralph Jackson; Larry Odom; Fred Coleman, Jr.; Sylvester Cousin; Sam Davis, Lutrelle Long, et al.
On behalf of the floor leaders of the past who were willing to ask the hard questions and press for candid answers–A. Lewis Williams, Woody Hall, James Oxley, Ulysses Hughey, J. D. Williams, et al.
And on the behalf of Joseph C. McKinney, committed layperson par excellence, who is absent only because of illness—
Who will today write or speak for them? Who will advocate today for greater accountability to restore the confidence of our members?
We say very quickly, “We love our church.” We get emotional during a worship service; we sing, pray, preach, and shout and someone cries out, “Who said the Church is dying?” We reiterate, “We love thy Church, O God; we love the AME Church.” But sometimes this uncritical love is not enough!
Uncritical love is not enough when we see the Church through the narrow lenses of “What’s best for me?” rather than “What’s best for the Church of Jesus Christ?” Uncritical love is not enough when we pass an inadequate connectional budget: when we permit some district to be excessive and not properly audited; when we ignore our law concerning the payment of the budget; when the compensation of our bishops is unrealistic; when the benefits to retired ministers and their widows are minimal. Uncritical love is not enough when we fail to require strict accountability and checks and balances all over the Church. Uncritical love is simply not enough when we lack the courage to correct an outdated, outmoded “system” of doing the business of the Church. Uncritical love is just not enough when we remain silent while wrong prevails.
But tough love is enough. It will motivate us to think boldly and act decisively on a new way of conducting our business, which will restore confidence in our integrity to do the right thing, to be on the right side of history. Love is tough when advocates are willing to take risks because they have nothing to lose or because they are willing to pay whatever price to ensure the viability and credibility of African Methodism.
We do not lack for sermons, Episcopal addresses, brain trusts and talks by the Lobby Committee—all with the same, the very same, conclusion: “We have problems and issues. We are not doing the will of God, but we need to. It’s the system.”
Among those who have lifted up the problems that plague the AME Church are Bishop Richard Allen Hildebrand in his sermon at the 1992 General Conference “The Work Is All Divine”; Bishop John Adams’ consecration sermon to the Class of 1992 and to all of us “When Is Enough Enough?” Bishop Frank Cummings’ presentation of the Episcopal Address at the 1996 General Conference with its insightful, relevant recommendations; Bishop Vinton R. Anderson’s convening of the “Brain Trust” in 1996 to address the serious problems of the Church; Bishop Phillip R. Cousin’s sermon at the 2000 General Conference “Reveille Time for the AME Church”; Bishop McKinley Young’s sermon “Seats or Service?” at the worship service at the 2001 Council of Bishops; Bishop A. J. Richardson’s sermon “Behind Enemy Lines” at St. Paul AME Church, Tampa, during the General Board meeting of 2002; and Bishop William P. DeVeaux’s sermon at the Worship Service of the 2002 Council of Bishops—“Fear Not!”
So on behalf of our departed giants and all of us who have tough love, let us make this 47th General Conference be about more than the election of bishops and the assigning of bishops, as important as both are, but let us prayerfully, thoughtfully, fearlessly, courageously commit ourselves to doing the right thing and being on the right side of history.